Subject:
|
Re: Couldn't resist bringing this to your attention(s)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 02:01:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1236 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, William R. Ward writes:
> "Steven lane" <steveroblane@aol.com> writes:
> > http://brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=14672
>
> Isn't the foul language used in this a violation of Brickshelf's ToS?
Since when is "crap" considered foul language? I recall that term being used
quite a bit here on Lugnet. I take it to mean "garbage" or "rubbish".
As for violating the TOS, I'm not sure. I don't think it does. But I also
think it's inappropriate because it's an opinion and not a Lego creation.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Couldn't resist bringing this to your attention(s)
|
| (...) It *is* a dirty word, though not on the FCC's infamous list. It is a slang term for feces, which is clearly inappropriate. BTW, Repeating it here probably violates LUGNET's ToS, so I replaced two letters in your quoted text with **. (...) Fine (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
