 | | Re: Pictures of my new train station - sneak preview of my new site
|
|
That's really nice. It reminds me of the wonderful town buildings in idea book 6000: (URL) Buiting <frank.buiting@infopulse.nl> wrote in message news:G0xv2K.H5J@lugnet.com... (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Finally -site re-launch!
|
|
Finally, I've made the complete updated version of my website! Most of the things I had on it is gone. My old creations are not there anymore, except for their DAT's, and that table-menu to the right is gone as well. So, what's new then? I've now (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | New Stories Section on My Site...
|
|
Just FYI, I have a new section on my site, just a test to see how everyone likes it. It is the First Chapter of an Ongoing story project I'm starting. See it here at: www.geocities.com/tj...tories.htm LMKWYT, Thanks! -John Rudy (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.western, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Fictional technology
|
|
(...) I have, mainly for my HMSDS series and most recently for my nanofig-scale models. Some buzzwords include "neutrino thrust stardrive", "fruitcake (highly-ionized depleted neutronium, probably a tightly bonded barium-3-carbon material)", etc. I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Fictional technology
|
|
I was wondering if anyone else has come up with technical explanations for fictional technology. I am putting my own Space sub-theme on the web site I'm building, and want to include explanations of things like 'shields', 'lasers', and other things. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Poll Reset (let's try it again)
|
|
(...) Not necessarally. I'm open to poll suggestions. KL (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Poll Reset (let's try it again)
|
|
(...) What, you want heatedly political? (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Poll Reset (let's try it again)
|
|
(...) I'm open to suggestions. KL (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Poll Reset (let's try it again)
|
|
(...) And hopefully, the Lego polls won't be so heatedly political to attract the interest of the remaining 1% or less. (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll
|
|
(...) I did something like that. It checks for frequent occurrances of IP and UA, and separately checks frequent occurances of IP regardless of UA. It also logs each successful vote so abuse patterns can be manually detected and the parameters (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Poll Reset (let's try it again)
|
|
(...) Ahhh, much better! :-) Repeating the same test as last time, this time it didn't let me put anything in twice. And since it shows the results right away, it only takes one or two resubmits to see that it can't be easily stuffed. That oughtta (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll
|
|
(...) OTOH, what I tried out was probably not something that most people would figure to give a try, so it may not end up being a real issue. If you ask people not to vote more than once (like explicitly state that, and make that a condition of (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll
|
|
(...) Google (...) Yes, Netscape does think resize == reload which is stupid. However, that is not what the problem was here. Hitting reload does not normally register additional votes. Todd stopped accepting cookies at just the right time and that (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll
|
|
(...) I've noticed that in plenty of Netscape versions, but I can't say I've ever seen it in MSIE. -Adam 8^D (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll
|
|
(...) Yea, I noticed Netscape at least does this. I think MSIE does also. It's pretty stupid. Sure, you may have to re-interpret the HTML to do the resize, but there is no good reason to do a re-load. It makes some web sites incredibly painful, get (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8sdf01.lvi.....bu.edu... (...) years (...) separate (...) rights. (...) Unfortunately, I don't believe I do. (...) Yeah, not worth it. I noted that before so that I could acknowledge it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
(...) Oops, looks like I misspoke(wrote). I just went back to the USPTO search page (URL) searched again with the "Registered" radio button selected (instead of "Both") and it didn't show up there, but showed up under "Pending." Thus, it appears (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
(...) To the extent that that e-mail forms a contract (which is relatively weak), and that e-mail has no specific provisions for review or renewal, I suspect you could continue using "webring" for the site(s)/system(s) described in that e-mail (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
(...) Do you still have that e-mail? That would be a good thing. "Web ring" is an extremely descriptive mark, and if you realllly wanted to go to court, you might be able to argue fair use. But I certainly don't think it's worth that! (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G13t90.194@lugnet.com... (...) servicemark (...) services (...) users (...) contain (...) word (...) This contradicts an email I got from a Webring representative a couple years ago, saying (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
