To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 2366
2365  |  2367
Subject: 
Re: 2001 Set info
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.publish
Date: 
Sun, 20 Aug 2000 20:00:59 GMT
Reply-To: 
(mattdm@mattdm.org)spamcake()
Viewed: 
4949 times
  
Geoffrey Hyde <ghyde@ledanet.com.au> wrote:
Todd - what the judge said appears to be totally useless and irrelevant to
the case that was being judged.  I reckon they'll appeal though.

Yeah. They were actually expecting this ruling. One advantage of having this
before the Supreme Court is that any ruling will be effective nationally,
not just in New York.


--
Matthew Miller                     --->                 mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                    --->              http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux            --->               http://linux.bu.edu/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 2001 Set info
 
Todd - what the judge said appears to be totally useless and irrelevant to the case that was being judged. I reckon they'll appeal though. Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:FzKMoI.92M@lugnet.com... (...) (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)

176 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR