Subject:
|
Re: 2001 Set info
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sun, 20 Aug 2000 05:43:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4883 times
|
| |
| |
Todd - what the judge said appears to be totally useless and irrelevant to
the case that was being judged. I reckon they'll appeal though.
Cheers ...
Geoffrey Hyde
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:FzKMoI.92M@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Matthew Miller writes:
> > Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> > > It may be and it may not be. Intellectual Property case law is changing
> > > every day. Months ago, it was not illegal to post links to things
> > > containing illegally obtained information. I seem to remember hearing or
> > > reading somewhere recently that some court somewhere recently decided the
> > > opposite.
> >
> > No such decision yet. The DeCSS case is in progress right now, and those of
> > us who care about freedom of speech and the web in general sure hope it'll
> > come down the other way. In fact, an important question in that case is
> > whether source code is speech, with the strong implication (from both the
> > defendants and the court) that if it is decided to be speech (as opposed to
> > being equivalent to a mechanical device), prohibiting linking runs against
> > first amendment issues.
>
> James Powell mentioned the bad news already on another thread (or was it
> another sub-branch of this huge thread?), but it bears repeating here for
> posterity...
>
> Here's a link to the Slashdot story for those who haven't seen it yet:
>
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/08/17/1827208
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Yeah. They were actually expecting this ruling. One advantage of having this before the Supreme Court is that any ruling will be effective nationally, not just in New York. (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) James Powell mentioned the bad news already on another thread (or was it another sub-branch of this huge thread?), but it bears repeating here for posterity... Here's a link to the Slashdot story for those who haven't seen it yet: (URL) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish)
|
176 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|