To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 2274 (-20)
  Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
 
(...) BTW, the reason I *had* to figure out how to do this is because after uploading a file, the server spits out a javascript redirect (this.replace ...) to the folder url the uploaded to. If that page was cached, the user would see the cached (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
 
(...) EXPIRES (...) Just a clarification, my example was for direct writing of HTTP headers, as you must do in a CGI. I suppose those tags would work as META HTTP-EQUIV tags in a web page, but I'm not sure if all proxy caches look at http-equivs, (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
 
(...) That's a keystroke, right? A process runs to generate these pages quite frequently. We want the user to see the most freshly generated page without the user having to take any action of their own. So we want to put tags into the page to tell (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
 
(...) <Ctrl> reload works for me. (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
 
(...) Wicked excellent. I'm going to try that. So the cookie rationale there is to avoid having cookies accidentally set twice, yes? In case one of the caching entities isn't smart enough to automatically not cache pages containing set-cookie (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: My New Webpage!!!
 
(...) Thanks! Forgot to say "Comments Welcome" -John Rudy (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.western, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
 
(...) I read somewhere that not all proxy caches will observe this. Actually I think it said they only look at the actual headers, not HTTP-EQUIV. It doesn't hurt to cover all bases. See my other post for details. KL (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
 
(...) Here's what I do to guarantee no caching: void printCGIheader(){ printf("Content-type: text/html\n"); printf("Expires: 0\n"); printf("Cache-control: no-cache\n"); printf("Pragma: no-cache\n"); printf("\n"); } void printCookieHeader(char (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
 
(...) Some browsers (I don't remember which ones, sorry) don't respect this. It's best to combine this with the expires header, I think. :( (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
 
In the header of the page add: <META HTTP-EQUIV="PRAGMA" CONTENT="NO-CACHE"> This tag also keeps pages from being cached by proxy servers... (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
 
(...) IIRC, there is a pragma no-cache that you can add to the HTTP headers. --Todd (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
 
Is there a better (any other?) way to force a page not to be cached but instead fetched from the server every time, other than using the META EXPIRES tag at the top of the page. That's the only way I found and am interested to learn if there are (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: My New Webpage!!!
 
(...) Nice work! Love Doc Brown's hair!!! --Todd (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.western, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: IE css help
 
(...) Turns out the answer is: it's a bug in IE 5.0. Seems to be fixed in 5.5. (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  My New Webpage!!!
 
Finally, I have a webpage showcasing my mocs. Head on over to: (URL) see everything. -John Rudy (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.western, lugnet.general)  
 
  IE css help
 
Argh. Can someone help me understand some weird Internet Explorer behavior with cascading style sheets? Check out (URL). The text there should appear approximately like this: Lorum ipsum dolor sit ament, con; venami quis nostrud laboris nisi ut (...) (25 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Two new Lego Photography tutorials posted
 
(...) Thanks Todd. That is high praise coming from someone who has already provided one of the greatest gifts to the community I can think of. If anyone thinks that any of the steps require elaboration, or are unclear, please let me know and I will (...) (25 years ago, 6-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Two new Lego Photography tutorials posted
 
(...) Recon (...) pictures (...) Good Eye. I noticed that too, after I spent about 4 hours editing the images. The fix... the addition of the following paragraph to the description. "The AR4 can carry up to 3 crew, a pilot, and a navigator. It also (...) (25 years ago, 6-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Two new Lego Photography tutorials posted
 
I love the banner ad on your front page. :^D You better talk to the boys down in the AI department. Seems that your Recon VTOL was cruising around with no pilot. Wonder what it was taking pictures of? ;^) ~Mark (25 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Two new Lego Photography tutorials posted
 
(...) An instant classic! (...) What an understatement! :) --Todd (25 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR