 | | Re: T.I.M.M.Y
|
|
(...) Is that any relation to our own Calum's www.livesquidinabox.com? :-) A well working proxy cache should be viewed as "in a box" and one certainly hopes it is live... FUT off-topic.fun ++Lar (25 years ago, 5-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: T.I.M.M.Y
|
|
(...) I'm serious about this, by the way. It may appear to work sometimes with some software, but since it's not actually legal, there are a lot of situations in which it won't. For example, it breaks the extremely popular squid proxy cache. (25 years ago, 5-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: T.I.M.M.Y
|
|
(...) hostname. (25 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: T.I.M.M.Y
|
|
Regardless of the pro Timmy messages, this site from one of the links is a hoot! Well detailed pics, a good story, and a 'suprise' ending. check it out! (URL) My best email address is: robdye@writeme.com (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: T.I.M.M.Y
|
|
(...) You do notice the only messages in your guestbook are pro-timmy! Timmy rocks! Alan (URL) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: T.I.M.M.Y
|
|
Did you at any point stop to think that you are spending hours of work to make a hate web page about an inanimate object? -T (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: T.I.M.M.Y
|
|
(...) Riiight...... A comment, though: Timmy is good for green minifig torsos and blank heads for custom minifigs. Greg "Oh no! The truck have started to move!" Majewski (URL) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: T.I.M.M.Y
|
|
Here is a sampling of a huge mass of sites I will be building, this one is a site against Timmy (kinda like those Leonardo DiCaprio hate pages you find online). I hope you enjoy and get a good laugh! LMKWYT! Address>> (URL) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | T.I.M.M.Y
|
|
Here is a sampling of a huge mass of sites I will be building, this one is a site against Timmy (kinda like those Leonardo DiCaprio hate pages you find online). I hope you enjoy and get a good laugh! LMKWYT! Erin -- (25 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | webcams for brickfest
|
|
I got the webcam software to work with my capture card. This means that I can use any video source (like my camcorder) for another webcam. I set that input up as camera 1 and the original usb webcam as camera 2 (currently at work). To directly (...) (25 years ago, 31-May-00, to lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
|
(...) I don't yet; I've got a bunch of pictures (ie thousands; not all of lego) that I need to go through and sort and process and so forth. The pictures on Karen's web page at (URL) aren't the best we've taken, but they're pretty decent. (I think (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
|
(...) Do you have a page up of examples? (LEGO in low light, bright light, macro zoom-in, etc?) One of the most frustrating things about the Mavica is that its CCD really needs a lot of light to take clear pictures. --Todd (25 years ago, 30-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
|
(...) Nikon's just come out with a newer slightly fancier model -- I bet there will be a lot of used 950s on the market soon.... (25 years ago, 30-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
|
Heh. I'm sure you do. But at ~$800 I sure won't be considering it. Thanks anyway, ~Mark (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
|
(...) I really like my Nikon Coolpix 950 for taking pictures of Lego. It's got a great feature for taking good shots in low light without flash or even a tripod. This might not be terribly useful for most purposes, but it's great for little shiny (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Color chart
|
|
I have a finished rough draft of an element color chart: (URL) to see how much order there can be to what was (to me) seeming like a jumble of new colors. Rather than render each swatch as an image, I used HTML's table background specs for the (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera
|
|
FUT .publish (...) Well, my Sony Mavica takes pretty good closeup shots. My dad bought it a year and a half ago for ~$250 (I *think*) and I'm sure prices have dropped since then. I dunno what price range you're looking for, but even I (on my $5 an (...) (25 years ago, 28-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Sort of off topic but...
|
|
(...) it (...) button, the internet options. Click the porgram tab and click the Reset Web Settings button. That'll make it the default browser again. Hope that helped! ~Nick (URL) (25 years ago, 28-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Sort of off topic but...
|
|
Does anyone know how to set Netscape or IE as the default browser? I got one of those Neoplanet customizeable browsers that when I installed it it became the default browser. I don't want to delete it or un-install it. -Kyle (URL) paid to surf the (...) (25 years ago, 28-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera
|
|
Ben Gatrelle <ben@yellowcastle.spam.com> wrote in message news:Fv1ruA.2En@lugnet.com... (...) (snippety snip) (...) horrible (...) an (...) No - the pictures were taken on a windowsill in daylight. As you say, the flash is no good for closeups, (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
