Subject:
|
Re: Making magazines (was Re: This is incredible!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 May 2000 12:07:53 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.%ihatespam%org
|
Viewed:
|
70 times
|
| |
|
|
Suzanne Rich <suz@baseplate.com> wrote:
> Assuming for a moment that this was a lower-level (artist's) decision (for
> whatever reason), I think it's very possible that the editors, etc had no
> clue that there was any special meaning to the logo. They may not have even
> seen it as a logo, rather as some ambiguous LEGO blob with fakey stuff
> around it. This would allow the page to pass through all hands
> unquestioned. I can imagine a confused proofreader asking what that word
> was (LUGNET) but that's about it.
Y'know, this sounds most reasonable to me. Funny that only a few months ago
it would have been cool that _anyone_ in Lego acknowledged the existence of
LUGnet; now, having actual official recognition in the form of Mr. Justus,
the exact same thing is disappointing.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
45 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
