Subject:
|
Re: This is incredible!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 May 2000 02:37:21 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
!
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2244 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.general, John Rudy writes:
> In lugnet.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> > Jeff Stembel <aulddragon@wamalug.org> wrote:
> > > And people who *do* happen to find it may very well think something like "Hey,
> > > cool! Lego created a website where I can talk to other fans!" And that would
> > > be bad...
> >
> > 1) not very likely considering the prominent disclaimer on the LUGnet page.
> >
> > 2) certainly not something Lego wants.
> And certainly not something Todd or any of us want. Think
> about it, lugnet by TLG, with flash and stupid animations.
> It sends shivers down my spine! Yick!
> -John Rudy
This is making me sick. Lego went out of their way to give us a little
smile when we opened up our mania magazine and we show our respect by doing
nothing but criticizing them for the past 24 hours! They put that logo in the
mag because they thought we would like it, not to disrespect Todd, or LUGNET.
They did not put in a URL etc. because they did not want to put a LUGNET
advertisement, that is why they put it a small computer less than and inch
big. They put it there as a private message for us. I doubt a typical 8
year old will look at that small logo and say "what is that" they will look at
the King Leos castle next to it.
Yes I agree that there should have been a URL or TM but the legal crowd
here needs to take a back seat and appreciate all the progress we have made in
our relationship with the company that creates the toys that we all love.
Rich
|
|
Message has 4 Replies: | | Re: This is incredible!
|
| (...) I've got just one comment here: A trademark owner is obligated to pursue situations like this or they could lose their trademark. That perhaps doesn't justify the discussion which is going on here, but that's beside the point. Note also that (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: This is incredible!
|
| (...) Well, aside from the fact that you're fantasizing about the motivation or intent behind the placement of the LUGNET logo... Trademarks are a serious thing. If you don't vigorously protect your trademarks you risk losing them. Just because you (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: This is incredible!
|
| Rich Manzo wrote in message ... (...) It is rather a fun thing that they did, however, would Lego be so understanding? They put that logo in the (...) LUGNET. (...) Try using Lego logo without permission and see how far these feel good arguments (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: This is incredible!
|
| (...) like "Hey, (...) would (...) And certainly not something Todd or any of us want. Think about it, lugnet by TLG, with flash and stupid animations. It sends shivers down my spine! Yick! -John Rudy (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.general)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|