Subject:
|
Re: Announcing Brickshelf.com Gallery for everyone!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:51:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1810 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Ben Roller writes:
> [...]
> Back to the minifigs though, do you think it would add a significant load-up
> time for the main page if we all chose different figs?
Depends on the size of the images and the number of images per page. The
neat thing is, with modern browsers and servers, a whole bunch of small
images totalling, say, 100KB can be transferred in roughly the same time
as one big 100KB image.
For example, here's a page containing 500 all-different randomly-generated
minifigs:
http://www.lugnet.com/people/members/minifig-test/
Each minifig there is 28x50 pixels and the file sizes average 909 bytes each,
for a total download size of approximately 500KB, including the index page
and HTTP protocol overhead. It's a slow-loading page, but then again there
are quite a few images.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Announcing Brickshelf.com Gallery for everyone!
|
| (...) Wow! Would it be possible to generate all of those with a height of 128 pixels (total, including space above and below fig.)? Those would look *much* better than my lousy scans (and I could add that feature *much* faster) :) KL (25 years ago, 12-Feb-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Announcing Brickshelf.com Gallery for everyone!
|
| (...) I like this idea. I prefer a large assortment of minifigs for each user to select on the main page, but having our own icons for the folders would be cool. I imagine someone like Larry having a GMLTC folder with their logo as the link to the (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
71 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
