Subject:
|
Re: McD set numbers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.promo
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Nov 1999 20:03:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1043 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999 13:47:01 GMT, "Huw Millington" <hmillington@cix.co.uk> wrote:
> From the scans at the McD site mentioned here, I believe the set numbers are
> as follows:
>
> 1 2032
yep
> 2 2065 ?
2069
> 3 2075 ?
yep
> 4 ?
1995. Go figure that one.
I don't know about the rest, don't have them yet.
> 5 2045
> 6 2047
> 7 1845
> 8 2025
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: McD set numbers
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:381f4329.249787...net.com... (...) Thanks for the clarification. As you say, the numbers to see to be somewhat arbitrarily allocated. (...) The scans of these is quite clear, so I think (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | McD set numbers [DAT]
|
| From the scans at the McD site mentioned here, I believe the set numbers are as follows: 1 2032 2 2065 ? 3 2075 ? 4 ? 5 2045 6 2047 7 1845 8 2025 Can anyone confirm this/fill in the blanks? Thanks Huw (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
5 Messages in This Thread: ![McD set numbers -Huw Millington (2-Nov-99 to lugnet.promo)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: McD set numbers -Ray Sanders (2-Nov-99 to lugnet.promo)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: McD set numbers -Richard Marchetti (8-Nov-99 to lugnet.promo)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: McD set numbers -Huw Millington (3-Nov-99 to lugnet.promo)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|