To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.piratesOpen lugnet.pirates in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Pirates / 114
113  |  115
Subject: 
Re: My fleet is bigger'n your fleet!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.pirates
Date: 
Fri, 5 Nov 1999 15:19:21 GMT
Viewed: 
3554 times
  
In lugnet.pirates, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> 
> 
> Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:

> > I was using it in the sense of the term as Steve Jackson uses it in his • Pirate
> > Game rather than an actual ship (I know, a Brig ain't a ship).
> 
> It's not a boat, either.  :)  I presume it's a simple matter of confluence.


It's a thing that floats and has sails.  :-)

> > > > Still lacking SES or BSB.  Sigh.
> > > 
> > > Someone asked:  Skull's Eye Schooner and Black Seas Barracuda.
> > > My fleet is primarily post-1870; it's three Fluyts (truncated Armada
> > flagships)
> > 
> > Not tubby enough (IMHO).  Whenever I get an extra brown midsection, I can
> > return one of my CCs to its proper hull, which would release the red hull to
> > become a 1 center section Fluyt.  They had fluyts post 1870?  I thought they
> > were much earlier.
> 
> Indeed fluyts are far far earlier (c.17th-C.).  The fleet is primarily • post-1870,
> but the fluyts and ironclads fall into an earlier era (Holdovers? • Anachronisms?
> Easy targets?  You decide!).  Sorry I wasn't clearer with my non-segue.  I • actually
> think a sectionless Armada Flagship is tubby enough for a Fluyt, if built-up
> properly--although maybe it's more of a cog, since it's hard to get more than • one
> effective mast on the darn thing.

I seemed to have mentally skipped over that "sectionless" Armada Flagship.
Yeah, that can be tubby, though I put two lateen sails on it and try to
visually lengthen my mid-sectionless AF.  A wide front/stern would be a true
tubby cog, though I have often refered to the stock Crossbone Clipper as a cog
(extremely derisively).

Bruce



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: My fleet is bigger'n your fleet!
 
(...) It's not a boat, either. :) I presume it's a simple matter of confluence. (...) Indeed fluyts are far far earlier (c.17th-C.). The fleet is primarily post-1870, but the fluyts and ironclads fall into an earlier era (Holdovers? Anachronisms? (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.pirates)

38 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR