 | | Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
|
|
(...) I see this sort of comment with fair regularity and it makes me sad. Not because I wish for these supposed "good days" but because it means people have already reached the stage where they are forgetting/rewriting the past. I've been around (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
|
|
(...) Well, all right. I don't really care about flame-wars because they're self-evidently juvenile and they tend to involve the same flamers over and over again. I myself have lamented what I will refer to as Rhinoceros Dominance (search for (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
|
|
(...) Hi Dave, You make a good point about the signal:noise ratio 1. With that I agree. I'm not sure that the dramas were so much in hidden forums as there was enough masking but either way I agree with your point. I would be worried if I saw (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
|
|
(...) Why is it always implied that newer members are largely to blame for LUGNET's decline? It seems to me that more often than not, newer members are even more uncomfortable here than you vetrans. LUGNET more than any other LEGO fan site, seems to (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
|
|
(...) Well I think (URL) this> comes pretty close, but I suppose that's subjective. ROSCO (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
|
|
(...) I see no such implication in anything Dave wrote here. (...) Huh? Not that I have anything against elitism, but LUGNET doesn't seem to even have any mechanisms for an elite, aside from background stuff (whether or not a set is put in the (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.people)
|
