|
|
 | | Re: My Latest MOC: A Little Human
|
| (...) Thanks everyone for your comments and best wishes! It's great to introduce a new LEGO fan :-) (Henry is only a week old, and he probably doesn't realize yet that he's a die-hard fan of the brick). Ok, I'll try not to brainwash the kid. At (...) (20 years ago, 6-Mar-05, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) I make no (public) judgement about his character but I would make the following points in reply to this post: 1. Working tirelessly for a community does not automatically mean you are suited to any particular role within that community, and 2. (...) (20 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people) !
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) Are you saying that I: a) have "had more spats with more people than anyone else on LUGNET?" b) have shown a "willingness to flout the rules"? and c) have caused trouble on bricklink? ...or are you just attacking me rather than answering the (...) (20 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) Look at it from the realistic side. The more exposure you have, the more chances something you wrote will upset someone else. Ever since I joined the community, Larry has consistantly been the most active participant here on Lugnet. This and (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) I can agree with you that the level of communication has been rather low. In fact I'm almost getting withdrawal symptoms, as the 'signal-to-fight' ratio has gone so low. I *know* that Larry has done, and does, a *lot* of good work for the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) Now there's the pot calling the kettle black... :P Rob (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) Tim, With respect, you are being obsequious. Can people not draw any conclusion from the fact that Larry has probably had more spats with more people than anyone else on LUGNET? Can they not make a judgment based on his willingness to flout (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Tim Courtney wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> Not directed at you, Tim ('cause I like you and all...) but I wonder how people would have felt if someone told Jefferson, et al. the above--"Don't go attacking those British lords in (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) I think most people know I'm not much of a "me too" guy. But sometimes, you just have to say, ME TOO! Larry's work has been dilegent and has profoundly contributed to our community. Larry's work in all the aspects of the community that he has (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | In support of Larry
|
| I'm ashamed of all the Larry-bashing that's been taking place. If you've only interacted with the man online (which I believe is the case with some of his harshest critics), you have no perspective on who he really is. Hence, you're really not (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people) !
|
|
