|
|
 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| "Jesse Alan Long" <kiraya_malzant@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:I45MzA.1yKA@lugnet.com... (...) LEGO HAS (...) would (...) that on (...) being (...) God (...) Suzanne, (...) with (...) a (...) also have (...) life. (...) the (...) was (...) (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) SNIP (...) SNIP (...) It's all useless. LGBT people can't seem to feel accepted in society unless they subdivide themselves into therapy groups. I'll still accept them, lavender bricks or not, and look upon their creations with the same eyes (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| I've had time to read and reread and reread this post and I'd like to add a few comments further, if I may. "Teddy Welsh" <ewelsh@wsc.ma.edu> wrote in message news:I40H0H.1yKv@lugnet.com... (...) No one is unwelcome at Lugnet, not even Richard (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) Replying to myself..., and Wayne, again. ;] Wayne upon re-reading my post and your reply, it dawned on me that perhaps you were in fact addressing my question, "Is LUGNET what you really want?", with your view being yes, and to those that it's (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) Wayne, I don't know if your question is meant to be rhetorical to the general members, or if it's directly specifically at me. If the latter, then unfortunately it reads like you missed the point of my post (or I failed to make it well). I was (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: any word from Tom Stangl ?
|
| (...) My rental house lost a few shingles, and has no power/phone, but otherwise we made it through OK. I'm getting tired of no power, though (I'm posting this from the in-laws, who borrowed one of my UPSes to hook their system to their generator). (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Kyle D. Jackson wrote: <snip> (...) No, what I expected when I joined LUGNET, was part resource, part discussion. .space mostly. I saw it as a place to exchange building ideas and maybe a little banter. But what I got (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: attention bicycle owners! (and Computer owners)
|
| (...) Seen last week on slashdot, a similar problem with computer locks (URL) Could this be a generic defect with barrel type locks? -Rob A> (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, FTX)
| | | | | two teens already found People/teen. Horray!!
|
| Looks like two teens already found the teen site. Wouldn't it be great if it just skyrocketed and we didn't lose all those thousands of kids a year to their "dark years". (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: attention bicycle owners!
|
| (...) I've reset the FUT on this post to .people, as it is clearly off-topic for .general, but more on-topic for .people. If you choose to continue bringing up non-LEGO topics, please keep them in .people or in .off-topic.* Thanks. -Tim (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people)
|
|
