 | | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
"Adrian Egli" <aegli@san.rr.com> skrev i meddelandet news:HD34nv.uo8@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) I don't agree with you there! At least if by 'the medium' you only mean real, physical bricks. I haven't got much opportunity to build with real Lego, (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) I don't disagree, but being a member of 'The friendliest place on the internet', I like the idea that people 'into Lego' are automatically included just because they are intrinsically valued as people to begin with. Hmm...here's a (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) My personal feeling is that the "LEGO community" doesn't really exist. That is to say there isn't a singular entity that can qualify to classify the group that might make up this definition. But rather, in my mind what you might really be (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Certainly anyone who does is welcome, but perhaps being a part of the community, or one of many 'LEGO communities' is a matter of individuals actively identifying with such groups...? -Tim (23 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tim Courtney writes: SNIP (...) HUGE SNIP (...) basically, any one that plays or works with ANY Lego building product. Jeff (23 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Great topic, Tim! Hmm... Well time for Hendo to babble again... :) In my analysis, the term "Lego Community" is a group of humanity that reaches far beyond any of the limitations you have suggested. The entire Lego Community includes TLC (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Thanks, Felix. (...) I haven't had time to formulate thoughts in reply to the other posts, but they're floating around in my head somewhere. You bring up a very good point, I think. Some individuals identify only with some components of "the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Hi Tim, These kind of conversations are what help us develop as a community. I applaude you for bringing it up. Its nice to see us going a step beyond merely coming together to share likes and dislikes. By stimulating this type of (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:HD21C7.1yst@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) WHEW! This is quite a topic to cover! But, hey, I like it :-) (...) As someone has already mentioned, LEGO is a medium. If someone uses that medium (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) But Lugnet is NOT the only internet community of LEGO fans, so calling Lugnet "the LEGO internet community" is innapropriate. Actually, "the LEGO internet community" is (URL) since the word order implies ownership by or direct association with (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
