 | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) I'm not quite sure I follow you, but as I did the list I found _a_lot_ of people that either did not post at all or only a few posts in 2001 that had a fair amount of posts in 2002. Of course I took away everyone who posted less then 50 times (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) Mine too - I got 147 posts, and I only ever post using Outlook Express! Go Microsoft!!! (j/k) ;-) Cheers, Paul (24 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) What I find most bizarre is how consistent the majority of posters are, the number of us who are within 0 or 1 of last years total is freakish. I imagine this is mostly down to the amount of time we each have to surf Lugnet. Psi (24 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) As a matter of fact I myself thought I'd be a good rocket (went from two posts to 21st place) and before I fell asleep last nigth I thought it would be cool to make a list with the biggest rockets from 2002. So I made that. Due to the fact I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Posting frequency?
|
| (...) then ancient history quietly disappears from view. Kerry (24 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
|
|
