 | | Re: Time to update the old roll call —Mike Poindexter
|
| | | (...) No, you are mistaken. On a small table, shots are not difficult due to large distances. They are difficult due to clutter. (...) I have been wanting a 10 foot snooker table for a long time. That my friend is the only way to go. (...) 6x12. The (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Time to update the old roll call —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) Bzzzt. 7x14. It wasn't a modern snooker table, 'twas an antique. (I was *very* *very* privilidged to be allowed to play on it - I count it among the signal honors I have been granted) It was (and presumably still is) 7x14 in table size. James (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Time to update the old roll call —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) Good point. (...) Why not a real 12? Jasper (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | |
