Subject:
|
Re: Time to update the old roll call
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Sat, 11 Dec 1999 10:13:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3583 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.people, Mike Poindexter writes:
> > > I'm awfully fond of my 9 footer. Played on just about every size out there
> > > (including a monster 7x14!) and I like my 9 foot.
>
> 6x12. The largest snooker table is the 6x12 size. It looks like it is about
> 14 feet and is almost that long when you add in the rails, but it is still
> referred to as a 6x12.
Bzzzt. 7x14. It wasn't a modern snooker table, 'twas an antique. (I was
*very* *very* privilidged to be allowed to play on it - I count it among the
signal honors I have been granted) It was (and presumably still is) 7x14 in
table size.
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Time to update the old roll call
|
| (...) No, you are mistaken. On a small table, shots are not difficult due to large distances. They are difficult due to clutter. (...) I have been wanting a 10 foot snooker table for a long time. That my friend is the only way to go. (...) 6x12. The (...) (27 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.people)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
