 | | Re: I'm a Dad!
|
|
(...) Congratulations! She's OK even though she's under 6 lbs I trust? That seems low weight to me, but I admit I know very little about babies - haven't even had the chance to try and make one. ;-) (Sure hope that changes soon.) Very good of her to (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm a Dad!
|
|
James, Congrats, We are now 5 days past due and everyone else is beating us to the punch :-). Well it will be soon for us I guess. Congrats again it seems to be an epidemic lately :-). Eric Kingsley (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm a Dad!
|
|
CONGRATULATIONS! Make sure the little one is holding a Duplo block within a day or so, just to get her started on a good thing early. ;-) (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| |
| | I'm a Dad!
|
|
:) Riana Kalen showed up at 11:17 PM last night, at 5 lbs, 15 ounces. Mother and baby are doing fine. :) (so don't expect any coherent messages from me about the next train show for a while, guys...) James (26 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.org.ca.nalug) !
|
| |
| | My Website
|
|
Here I go again... (URL) check out my pathetic website! sid (onedaycnn) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Just a little something...
|
|
(...) Hmmmm....you've got a point there... <sheepish look> oops. :-) FUT OT.fun. -Chris (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Just a little something...
|
|
(...) Uhh, I'd be curious to learn what this poetry has to do with LEGO and why it was posted to the top-level .announce group. Hmm, for that matter, why the .people group and not .off-topic.fun? --Todd (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Just a little something...
|
|
Just wanted to make a little announcement, cause Shiri's too modest to speak up...;-) www.geocities.com/sh...i_writing/ Please let her know what you think. -Chris (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.people) !
|
| |
| | pw checking (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
|
|
(...) Well, enough new things that I think it will be hard for anyone to continue belittling the checking anymore. Plus, as I said before, it's possible (and likely, I hope) that the checking will be less stringent. Right now I'm guesstimating that (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) I was thinking more from the perspective of what you are going to create that will have a span of 9 months and not what might happen on the internet outside of LUGNET in 9 months. This still doesn't explain why you have a sophisticated (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) that (...) Is this debate flamebait? Or sarcasm The FDIC needs to do risk based underwriting instead of charging all banks the same rates. Online banks with lax security should have to pay higher premiums. FUT .debate if you must (seems (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Password Tips
|
|
(...) Easially? (...) Hey, we better enhance the tester to prevent that password, it's kind of sort of easy to remember. <GD&R> Seriously, I like the active anti cracker defense idea a lot better and I think that's the better way to solve the (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Thread views (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
|
|
(...) When you're viewing an article at the website (such as through one of the links as shown above), scroll down to the bottom of the page and click one of the "Entire Thread on One Page" links. You can see the thread in nested thread form or in (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
Todd - an interesting but minor question to these thread links - if I wanted the thread unraveled all the way back to it's source post, how would I do that? Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Password checks (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
|
|
(...) I agree! In a cookie, you can put complete random garbage that only the authentication server knows how to interpret. And if certain bits contain an index, you can even use a one-time pad or other complex mapping to encrypt the data so that (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) What do you think about this?-- (URL) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) ahh.... at least they have that one little thing that means so much to me... FDIC insured. :) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) Actually I found PayPal's pw filter to be fairly stringent. KL (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) A combination of things... first, by then there will be more things in place that will matter more; second, the pw validator will very likely be less stringent; third, I predict that within the next nine months, a major online banking site (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
