 | | Re: LUGNET Memberships —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) A combination of things... first, by then there will be more things in place that will matter more; second, the pw validator will very likely be less stringent; third, I predict that within the next nine months, a major online banking site (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | (...) Actually I found PayPal's pw filter to be fairly stringent. KL (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) What do you think about this?-- (URL) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships —Geoffrey Hyde
|
| | | | | | Todd - an interesting but minor question to these thread links - if I wanted the thread unraveled all the way back to it's source post, how would I do that? Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Thread views (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) When you're viewing an article at the website (such as through one of the links as shown above), scroll down to the bottom of the page and click one of the "Entire Thread on One Page" links. You can see the thread in nested thread form or in (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships —Dan Jezek
|
| | | | (...) I was thinking more from the perspective of what you are going to create that will have a span of 9 months and not what might happen on the internet outside of LUGNET in 9 months. This still doesn't explain why you have a sophisticated (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | pw checking (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Well, enough new things that I think it will be hard for anyone to continue belittling the checking anymore. Plus, as I said before, it's possible (and likely, I hope) that the checking will be less stringent. Right now I'm guesstimating that (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
