|
|
 | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) ... (...) ... (...) ... Tobbe, I'm not as big a rocket as you might suggest. I think that you may have used the wrong list from 2001. As I recall, Dan Boger posted two lists; the first one was incorrect. correct 2001 list (URL) Clark 193 (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) I'm not quite sure I follow you, but as I did the list I found _a_lot_ of people that either did not post at all or only a few posts in 2001 that had a fair amount of posts in 2002. Of course I took away everyone who posted less then 50 times (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) Mine too - I got 147 posts, and I only ever post using Outlook Express! Go Microsoft!!! (j/k) ;-) Cheers, Paul (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) What I find most bizarre is how consistent the majority of posters are, the number of us who are within 0 or 1 of last years total is freakish. I imagine this is mostly down to the amount of time we each have to surf Lugnet. Psi (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) As a matter of fact I myself thought I'd be a good rocket (went from two posts to 21st place) and before I fell asleep last nigth I thought it would be cool to make a list with the biggest rockets from 2002. So I made that. Due to the fact I (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
