To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.parts.customOpen lugnet.parts.custom in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Parts / Custom / 176
175  |  177
Subject: 
Re: IR train base alternative
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.parts.custom, lugnet.parts.mod
Date: 
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:40:28 GMT
Viewed: 
44 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Ondrew Hartigan wrote:
   In lugnet.trains, Will Chapman wrote:
   In lugnet.trains, Ondrew Hartigan wrote:

   To start I disassembled the train base by taking out the 8 extremely tight screws I then removed the circuit board and soldered on a diode bridge (bridge rectifier) in place of the 2 tin battery pack leads. Now basically what this means is no matter what the polarity is going into the IR unit, the voltage going into the circuit board remains the same. This protects the circuit board and makes it idiot friendly. =).

Ondrew, how did you handle the voltage drop through the bridge rectifier? Did you measure any top-speed dropout?

Curious, ---Will

i never really tested it to see what the drop was. i can’t imagine it was much though. ondrew

Actually a typical bridge rectifier will drop ~1.4 volts in the supply. That’s alot! About a 16% drop in voltage, and a 29% drop in overall power at the top end. I’m not sure what effect this would have on the control circuitry.

Mat



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: IR train base alternative
 
(...) i never really tested it to see what the drop was. i can't imagine it was much though. ondrew (18 years ago, 26-Sep-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.parts.custom, lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)

11 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR