Subject:
|
Re: Age Limit for WAFOL
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.wafol
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 17:31:07 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@io.com[spamless]
|
Viewed:
|
2005 times
|
| |
| |
Nathan Falslev wrote:
> I've been in lugnet.space for a while now and just now started looking into
> local groups. I came across the large(300+) "Age Limitations" discussion and
> wondered what WAFOL's limit, if any, was. I searched in the previously
> mentioned discussion and found no views. I don't neccesarilly want to join
> right now, I'm simply pondering some things.
Hi, Nathan! AFAIK, we haven't really formally discussed age limitations.
It has been mentioned that we'd prefer adults (mainly for liability and some
other reasons), though we've had at least one meeting with a minor.
By the same token, we have no concrete membership criteria, either. No
dues, no lists, no charter, nada. It seems we're pretty flexible. :-,
We're also pretty small at the moment (maybe 3 "full-time" members), so
virtually any new face would be welcome.
Perhaps this is something to discuss at our next meeting... Perhaps a
reason to have another meeting? ;-) I dunno about you guys, but BrikWars
is looking pretty keen; perhaps we could try a game or two next meeting.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
Is it still illegal if I copy just the FBI warning?
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Age Limit for WAFOL
|
| I've been in lugnet.space for a while now and just now started looking into local groups. I came across the large(300+) "Age Limitations" discussion and wondered what WAFOL's limit, if any, was. I searched in the previously mentioned discussion and (...) (24 years ago, 4-Sep-00, to lugnet.org.us.wafol)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|