 | | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
|
(...) I believe that we were considering using some cross pieces in our layout. I admit to using the "head-on" term incorrectly for dramatic purpose. One train would run into the side of another. Leonard (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
| |
| | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
|
(...) My wife would concur! TJ- who definitely knows who "the boss" is, and it's not him ;-) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
| |
| | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.texlug, Leonard Erlandson writes: <snip> (...) I don't mean to "butt" into y'alls group, but I was wondering how you plan on running two trains so that they can hit head-on? You can't do that with the standard out of the box LEGO (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
| |
| | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
|
(...) lol! Finally, a man who knows the proper place of women!! Margaret did good... BTW, I really enjoyed meeting both of you on Saturday. Welcome to the group! Laura (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
| |
| | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
|
(...) Her name is . . . Margaret. I'm used to saying "my wife" becuase I'm used to posting to groups who haven't met her. I'll refer to her as Margaret from now on. You, however, can refer to her however you like, but I would suggest either Margaret (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
| |
| | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
|
Okay Leonard, When TJ wrote Mr and Mrs Leonard I forgave him for not knowing your wife's name (because I managed to forget it, too). You should use it, though. She is as valuable a member of Texlug as you (even more so, because she is a woman). So (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
| |
| | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
|
(...) Thanks! (...) deserves the credit for the model. I had looked at it once and tried to duplicate it by memory. I think I was close. Thanks Jake! (...) Well the bridges were great! I didn't mind the problem. Most of the trains made it through (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
| |
| | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
|
(...) The bridges were plenty wide. The boxcar my wife built was just too wide in design. She's working on a redesign right now that I think will be much more visually pleasing and a bit narrower. I'm also working on my engine, but I'm afraid it (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
| |
| | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
|
(...) Uh, I guess no one bothered to check my math, but the list contains 14 people, and not 13 as previously stated. Doh! And I'm supposed to be good with math! TJ "the scatterbrained" ‹;-þ (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
| |
| | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
|
(...) Ah! Sorry I didn't catch the name. A most excellent model! (...) Do you mean Jake McKee's boxcar: (URL)We ran various train combinations around the tracks and bridges, and we (...) Ha! I though I was being conservative in my bridge design. I (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
