Subject:
|
Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.texlug
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:15:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2044 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.texlug, Leonard Erlandson writes:
<snip>
> For next time I plan on making an engine designed for a head-on collision.
> I'll make sure it flies apart in a dramatic way and snaps back together easily
> for another run! Anybody else interested?
>
> Leonard
I don't mean to "butt" into y'alls group, but I was wondering how you plan
on running two trains so that they can hit head-on? You can't do that with
the standard out of the box LEGO train system. Are you (or have you)
converted your trains to another control method, such as DCC?
jt
----------------
James J. Trobaugh
North Georgia LEGO Train Club
http://www.ngltc.org
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
| (...) I believe that we were considering using some cross pieces in our layout. I admit to using the "head-on" term incorrectly for dramatic purpose. One train would run into the side of another. Leonard (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: TEXLUG Meeting Wrap-up
|
| (...) The bridges were plenty wide. The boxcar my wife built was just too wide in design. She's working on a redesign right now that I think will be much more visually pleasing and a bit narrower. I'm also working on my engine, but I'm afraid it (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.texlug)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
