Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.nelug
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:34:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1066 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Eric Kingsley writes:
> [...]
> 4. I will consider however changing the age limit (either up or down) to a
> solid limit that is not subjective. (That does not mean I will vote for or
> against a change just that I will consider all the issues involved and make
> an informed decision.)
> [...]
Eeek -- "up or down"? -- was that a typo or do you mean up or down subject
to certain circumstances such as bars? I hope NELUG doesn't even consider
raising the basic requirement above 18... I have no problem with the limit
being 21 for "subset" meetings at bars if everyone is getting sloshed, but
please let's not raise the basic fundamental requirement! -- I am looking
forward to Tim C. being able to be a full NELUG member in the fall when he
arrives here for school.
my $.02...
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) Well I suppose I should explain. I pretty much said it that way because it is a option. I personally don't think its a good option and would not vote for any sort of increase in the limit. I also put it there because if we do vote to reduce (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| Now that I have had time to read and reread all of the posts in this thread and I have calmed to below boiling point I thought I would try and make a constructive post about some of my feelings about this issue. (Please note that I said "some of my (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug) !
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
