 | | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) Doh! The sad thing is I went through and tried to make sure I didn't DO that (I've been known to a couple times).. musta missed one... DaveE (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
"Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote: <chop an excellent disertation> (...) ...When we (WAMALUG) were making up our Charter, we wrestled with the jrfol issue some too. Some of us, myself included, wanted to be part of the club mostly to be (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.org.us.nclug)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
Uhhh... tiny nitpick :-) (...) ^^^^^^ (you do mean NELUG, right?! just checking... didn't know there was a requirement for LUGNET too!! <grin>) Otherwise, you brought up some extremely valid points. -Shiri (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
Alright, I'm going to jump in here (I suppose it was inevitable) and say I'm agreeing with Todd-- (...) Well, I'll jump in here real quick with a minor point-- Lego's attitude has rarely (if ever, aside from the recent UCS sets and potentially LD) (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
"Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:Fx5tJo.F84@lugnet.com... [... snipped ... ] (...) so (...) I just returned from my parents house (Northern Virginia - I did make it to the LEGO Outlet, you just gotta like the scratch and (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.org.us.nclug)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) Thanks Bram, Obviously this should have read "I have heard some good arguments for changing the rule and some good arguments for NOT changing the rule". (...) Well no problem, I just wish the discussion had remained civil so my "Devil inside" (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Other NELUG matters to discuss at our Meeting.
|
|
As a result of the recent discussions on LUGNET I would like to propose a couple of other issues for discussion. 1. I think we should decide on what constitutes a voting member (After we have resolved the Age rule under the current rules). 2. I (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) ^^^^^^^^ (...) ^^^^^^^^ Well, that doesn't leave you much choice, does it? :) j/k Thanks for being civil, --Bram Bram Lambrecht.........Br...L@JUNO.com (URL) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
Now that I have had time to read and reread all of the posts in this thread and I have calmed to below boiling point I thought I would try and make a constructive post about some of my feelings about this issue. (Please note that I said "some of my (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug) !
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations - my two cents
|
|
(...) take (...) the (...) case (...) groups (...) logical (...) Jumping in from outside again (please note - follow-ups to lugnet.org), please take the following as a suggestion (and other LUGs who are grappling with membership policies should also (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.org)
|
