|
|
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) Thanks Bram, Obviously this should have read "I have heard some good arguments for changing the rule and some good arguments for NOT changing the rule". (...) Well no problem, I just wish the discussion had remained civil so my "Devil inside" (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | Other NELUG matters to discuss at our Meeting.
|
| As a result of the recent discussions on LUGNET I would like to propose a couple of other issues for discussion. 1. I think we should decide on what constitutes a voting member (After we have resolved the Age rule under the current rules). 2. I (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) ^^^^^^^^ (...) ^^^^^^^^ Well, that doesn't leave you much choice, does it? :) j/k Thanks for being civil, --Bram Bram Lambrecht.........Br...L@JUNO.com (URL) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | Re: Age limitations
|
| Now that I have had time to read and reread all of the posts in this thread and I have calmed to below boiling point I thought I would try and make a constructive post about some of my feelings about this issue. (Please note that I said "some of my (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug) !
| | | | | Re: Age limitations - my two cents
|
| (...) take (...) the (...) case (...) groups (...) logical (...) Jumping in from outside again (please note - follow-ups to lugnet.org), please take the following as a suggestion (and other LUGs who are grappling with membership policies should also (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.org)
|
|
