Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.nelug
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Jul 2000 04:48:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5262 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Richard W. Schamus writes:
> I never leaped to poke anything. I just don't want the
> question to be "politely" swept under the rug of a NELUG meeting, just because
> you say it should be. What ever you decide for Shiri is up to you (NELUG). I
> have no, (and should have no), bearing on your determination. I just think
> that repeated attempts to quash opinion in the matter by some, saying that it
> should be private are not within the bounds of the original poster's wishes. I
> didn't start the discussion. We (LUGNET) are not forcing you (NELUG) to make a
> decision publicly, (or privately for that matter). What ever reasons you feel
> that we are forcing you to do so, is totally put upon you by yourselves.
But when we say we will discuss it at a meeting, you say we are attempting to
stop people from talking about it.
I really can't understand what it is you're trying to say. I am trying very
hard because, believe it or not, I do want to. But you seem to contradict
yourself.
> The question remains. Why an age limit for those who have demonstrated
> maturity?
And the same answer remains, whether or not you find it satisfactory: We
want(ed) it that way. The decision to keep it that way or not will be decided
at a NELUG meeting, not in a public forum. It is NELUG club business, and
deserves closer attention and discussion.
That's just the way it is.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) because (...) I (...) a (...) This is all well and good. Your decicions, at your meet, at your club. I do not contridict myself. You keep asking to let it lie, (which you can ASK all you want,) but the ORIGINAL poster(Shiri) asked for a public (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) your (...) do (...) The last time I checked a dictionary, the definition of exclutionary was something or some one that excludes something from its boundaries or grouping. I'm not saying anyone is arrogant. I actually respect NELUG's right to (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
