Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.nelug
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 17:39:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1340 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us, Richard Franks writes:
> If the original post was only sent to lugnet.org.us.nelug group then would
> that
> have been acceptable?
Certainly more acceptable.
> As a discussion group, I think it's entirely reasonable to cross-post to gauge
> opinions.
No offense, but I really don't think the opinions of anyone but NELUG members
really matter in this decision, so I really don't think it's necessar to gauge
their opinions.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) No offence taken - it's a good point. (...) Not necessary, but I think you'll agree that if there had been more positive suggestions (eg probation, age-limits for event locations etc), and less bickering and name calling.. then cross-posting (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) If the original post was only sent to lugnet.org.us.nelug group then would that have been acceptable? (...) You misread -- I never mentioned the topicity of the subject. (...) That's *your* read. As a discussion group, I think it's entirely (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
