 | | Re: 2002 NELUG wall calendar —Suzanne D. Rich
| | | | (...) I'm not arguing, just saying.. A screened graphic could travel under date boxes. In which case multicolor wouldn't be out of the question. Percentage varies greatly with ink, screen type, and paper stock. If spec'ing a PMS color for instance, (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 2002 NELUG wall calendar —Jim Green
| | | | | Dangerously, I got to thinking again... (...) Agreed, definitely no argument. In my mind I was thinking b+1 if anything. I just wanted to acknowledge that it's a bad idea to screen a photo in full- color... you tend to lose the yellows, bright (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 2002 NELUG wall calendar —Eric Joslin
| | | | | | (...) Umm, I don't usually do print stuff (and therefore am mostly talking out of my posterior, here) but I can recommend Micro Print on Bear Hill Rd. in Waltham. I needed something very specific, but didn't know the right terms to put it in, but (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 2002 NELUG wall calendar —Suzanne D. Rich
| | | | | (...) You mean they gave you a scratch-n-sniff chicken for lunch?? ;^) (...) :-p~ [salivatory response triggered] (...) Nooooo! make it stop! (sobbing) (...) that's true. But we might not get our LEGO back (!!) Lord knows what crawls around those (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | | |
