 | | Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
|
|
(...) Not really. Does anyone else from Team B think it's terribly wrong of us to reveal what we've got? I don't particularly care. It makes for good planning, I suppose. But then again, I suppose I wasn't really planning to bring anything to the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
|
|
(...) We on Team A have a pretty solid idea of troop / fortification type. I think what we've built and the style of it are relevant to this discussion. If everyone will see our stuff on Monday anyway, and we're building a storyline now, is there (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
|
|
(...) Well-- really what it means is like Eric J. said (and I recall saying in the past), wherein if one team is defending, the attacking team gets a bit of a bonus becuase defending a good position/item has slight advantages. My thought on (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
|
|
Hi, Richard Again. You guys sound so very technical about everything! Therefore, the best technical wargame out there is WARHAMMER(R) Check out their section on Senerion, and capturing an objective. Every thing in their games is completely balanced (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
|
|
(...) Possibly. Part of the problem is that we've never really planned ahead in quite this much detail (picking sides, etc). A good rule of thumb for wargames like this is that an army defending a well-fortified position should get somewhere between (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
