To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.nelugOpen lugnet.org.us.nelug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / NELUG / 1003
1002  |  1004
Subject: 
Re: Layout perspective...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.nelug
Date: 
Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:18:05 GMT
Viewed: 
2316 times
  
In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Eric Kingsley writes:
> 
> > Actually if we can do 2 trains running at the same time this is pretty much
> > what I would like the track to look like.  I realize that getting that many
> > baseplates probably isn't realistic however.
> 
> Why not?  After all, we have that, umm, thing we were discussing in that, umm,
> other forum that could maybe help.  I don't think it would be too taxing on...
> that is to say...

Well umm you are right of course but I didn't want to spend anything without
group approval.  Actually I have my catalog here.  Give me some time to figure
out the cost of doing this and then I will post something in the "Other Forum"
to see what people think.

> 
> Uh.  Nevermind, I think you get the point.
> 
> Why don't we go with this?  We can start laying claim to bits of it, saying
> what we have and where it'll fit.

That would be a hugh benifit of doing it this way.


Eric Kingsley

The New England LEGO Users Group
http://www.nelug.org/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Layout perspective...
 
(...) Why not? After all, we have that, umm, thing we were discussing in that, umm, other forum that could maybe help. I don't think it would be too taxing on... that is to say... Uh. Nevermind, I think you get the point. Why don't we go with this? (...) (26 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR