Subject:
|
Re: Next Meeting - I'll make a decision this weekend
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.lugola
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 03:19:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
594 times
|
| |
|
|
Hmm - With the cost of LEGO, I think it would be a LOT cheaper to go with
the concrete.
Speaking of that, they poured the concrete today, so that gets a big part of
the work out of the way. They still have to finish two walls, put in the
sprinklers and the plants. If we get two rain-free days (as is predicted),
they could make a lot of progress towards that.
Scott Costello <scottcos@spamfree.aol.com> wrote in message
news:G9uKMu.6zB@lugnet.com...
> Forget the concrete and landscaping materials, lets just get a bunch of
> green baseplates and line the entire yard. Imagine the city you could • build,
> granted it wouldn't be much fun to walk on. If you want a pond, no problem
> just get some blue baseplates. Need ducks on your pond, or a foutain? • Build
> them. Don't plant flowers, build them. Now with brown service packs you
> could even build a tree. Just imagine the possibilities.
>
> Scott
>
> In lugnet.org.us.lugola, Brad Hamilton writes:
> > But we need the concrete - Otherwise, the LEGO will sink into the mud!
> >
> > I suppose we could use some cheap immitation LEGO as a foundation!
> >
> > Hmm - an outdoor LEGO city would be cool, but I bet that it wouldn't last
> > too long. Plus, I'd be afraid of someone stealing my LEGO!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
