Subject:
|
Re: Requirements for Layout Design
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.lucny
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 05:05:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1625 times
|
| |
|
|
Sounds good to me. Got to put up pictures of the car we are working on.
--
Thanx~
Nicole Drumm MS
http://www.geocities.com/duelarcane1/
Brickshelf Account: drumm-family
Geekshelf Account: Drumm-Family
Bricklink Store: drumm_family or Drumm's Small Lots
"Wayne Sardullo" <sardullo@oswego.edu> wrote in message
news:H2KEK3.7sF@lugnet.com...
> I'm setting in Stone some "Absolute" requirements for consideration when you
> are building layout items that may include train tracks. This has come up on
> one of my own projects. I've corrected the issue. In light of this I'd like • you
> all to consider the Following. I would also like you guys to point out or
> suggest anything else that might cause issues while creating items for a mass
> layout.
>
> #1 Any Platform, Bridge, Wall, .... should be able to pass a 10 stud brick
> between it on a Straight Track run.
>
> #2 Any Bricks/Plates/Tiles that are used exclusively on the ties of the track
> WILL NOT exceed the height of the track rails.
>
> #3 Curves and Switches - Make sure you leave extra width for curves so that
> long freight and Locos can pass clearly without derailing.
>
> Wayne
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Requirements for Layout Design
|
| I'm setting in Stone some "Absolute" requirements for consideration when you are building layout items that may include train tracks. This has come up on one of my own projects. I've corrected the issue. In light of this I'd like you all to consider (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.lucny)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
