To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.laflrcOpen lugnet.org.us.laflrc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / LafLRC / 409
408  |  410
Subject: 
Re: "The" Course
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
Date: 
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:03:31 GMT
Viewed: 
2730 times
  
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
I just had an idea about the Rock Crawling course.

I was thinking about how we can make it hard for the good trucks, and
possible for the not-so-good trucks.  The answer is two courses.  But
not two separate courses, just two paths for each obstacle.

I agree.


(In "real" rock crawling, the scoring is like golf, where a
high-score is bad.  I'm going to suggest we go with a more-normal:
points-are-good system.)

Yes - do a higher is better scoring system...I, for one, will be less confused.

We can then award bonus points for the design of the vehicle.  4WD, rear
steering, and multiple types of suspension points (ie - 2 wheel suspension, 4
wheel suspension, 4 wheel independent suspension, etc)

B



Message is in Reply To:
  "The" Course
 
I just had an idea about the Rock Crawling course. I was thinking about how we can make it hard for the good trucks, and possible for the not-so-good trucks. The answer is two courses. But not two separate courses, just two paths for each obstacle. (...) (17 years ago, 10-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR