To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.delvalugOpen lugnet.org.us.delvalug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / DelVaLUG / 13
12  |  14
Subject: 
The DelVaLUG logo: critiques
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.delvalug
Date: 
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 03:07:46 GMT
Viewed: 
2514 times
  
I'm sure much effort was expended in designing and creating the DelVaLUG logo,
so I don't want to stomp on any aesthetic toes; but I've got some critiques.  If
there's consensus, I can help with the redrafting.

The left-corner female face: it looks sad, or possibly ill -- the eyebrows
aren't upcurved-happy, and the mouth is pouty.

The bridge graphic is, visually, too busy/complicated -- at least for small
versions.  A silohuette of the bridge would suffice; the tiniest versions would
have to dispense with the studs.  Reduce the number of railing-arches, maybe.
And what's with that 16-stud plate for the roadbed?  Given our region's history,
a *covered* bridge would be more distinctive.

The motto: "Bridging the gap."  That implies an organization devoted primarily
to outreach.  "What gap?" I wonder, and think: between AFOLs, or AFOLs and
pre-AFOLs, or bricks?  It's a strained connection, IMHO.  Offhand, I can't think
of any bridge-topical phrases that are better.  ("Bridge to the future."  "Land
of bridges."  "Spanning the fissure of fun.")

Use of a sans-serif font *was* a good idea.



1 Message in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR