Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Jul 2000 16:34:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1859 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.org.us, Richard Franks writes:
> <snip>
>
> I just read this whole subtree and I would like to reiterate Frank's call for
> setting followups on posts carefully.
Yup, in hindsight, setting the followups to lugnet.org.us.nelug on this topic
is likely to cause an ugly subtree, my bad.
> If what you are discussing is generic to all LUGs, it ought to be to org.us
> NOT to org.us.nelug.
I wondered about this before - why lugnet.org.us rather than lugnet.org? For
reasons of law and liability I can understand narrowing it down to a specific
country, but for the more general issues I don't understand why.
Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) You know what? You're right. I hate that! FUT lugnet.org, who so far have missed out on the blast. Take your general questions there. (or maybe to lugnet.loc.it, I hear they're itching for some long post chains so they can pass lugnet.loc.uk (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) If the original post was only sent to lugnet.org.us.nelug group then would that have been acceptable? (...) You misread -- I never mentioned the topicity of the subject. (...) That's *your* read. As a discussion group, I think it's entirely (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
