| |
In lugnet.org.us, Frank Filz writes:
> [...]
> I'm curious as to why the group unanimously felt that they had to exclude
> people under 18? In some ways, it almost strikes me as an insecurity on the
> part of the members.
> [...]
It's interesting to note that the age range of the people attending the first
two meetings was, IIRC, approximately 22 to 34. I think this may have had a
lot to do with the way things got rolling initially. I can only wonder where
things would have wound up today had there been a 16- or 17-year-old at the
first two meetings.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) NELUG's (...) Perhaps it is arrogant for outsiders to suggest a change (however, I would also point out that I actually have a minor vested interest in that I have family in the area, so would consider becoming a member of NELUG, and I have a (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
