| |
In lugnet.org.us, Shiri Dori writes:
> I don't feel like it's personal *against* me.
> But I do think it *should* be personal *for* me.
No. As soon as we make a personal exception for you, then we have to judge
each person under whatever age limit we set personally, and as others have said
time and time again, that is *not* something we want to get into.
> I also hope, and maybe even expect, that you guys talk about it next meeting,
> and seriously consider either:
Obviously, by dragging this back into Lugnet- all over Lugnet, too, by the wide
crossposting of your initial message- this is going to be something NELUG talks
about.
I have to tell you, though, that you're doing very little to sway my opinion in
your favor, and very much to prove to me that I was right in being one of the
people in NELUG to firmly stand behind the age limit.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) Fine. Change the policy such that you don't have to do all that extra work that seems to be so loathed by your group, and still let excellent builders into the group who just happen to be younger than 18. As it stands, it is pointless, stupid, (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) I can tell you it isn't. Let me tell you, it's not easy to say things like this, which is why I'm glad Chris is saying what I think, simply because he knows what I'm going through. It's hard to say this, but yeah- I AM alone here. It's hard to (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
