Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 06:10:27 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
(mattdm@)nomorespam(mattdm.org)
|
Viewed:
|
1840 times
|
| |
|
|
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote:
> So Shiri isn't a "serious" LEGO fan? My dictionary doesn't define "serious" as
I think you started replying before you read the whole message:
> > This wasn't done with the intent to exclude someone like Shiri, but it's
We felt that we had to draw the line somewhere. I don't remember the
particulars of other people's opinions on this next point, but personally I
think making exceptions / judging each person individually leads to more
strife and difficulty. It's (obviously) complicated when there *is* a
special situation with undisputed merit.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) as (...) No I did read the whole message. What I'm trying to do is get you to re- examine the reasoning that led to the feeling the group had to be adult only. So far, the only issues which I can accept as legitimate which have been raised are (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) So Shiri isn't a "serious" LEGO fan? My dictionary doesn't define "serious" as implying "adult". I have to admit that I've never joined any sort of "users group" (<sick humor>of course if one uses the coloquial definition of "user" then I'm (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
