| |
In lugnet.org.us, Peter White writes:
> In lugnet.org.us, Matthew Miller writes:
> > Peter White <aztekium@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > By the way, I have no aim in becoming a member or voting, it was a joke.
>
> You like taking things out of context. That particular line was a joke,
> NOT the whole argument.
> I work nights, so I'm staying up too !
> Don't twist things around and try and make it appear that your supporting
> her or her request, you are defending your groups decision.
I think Matther is giving consideration to Shiri's request. He has stated that
he is willing to bring the issue up again in a future meeting. Let's not allow
our frustration with the situation cause us to start throwing bricks (and I
will admit that my frustration is coloring my responses - but this type of
issue is very near and dear to me [look at my member page, this issue goes to
the core of my personal beliefs], however, I also respect the right of an
organization to determine its own membership, I can only debate with them the
reasons for their rules, and complain about a poorly chosen name).
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) You like taking things out of context. That particular line was a joke, NOT the whole argument. I work nights, so I'm staying up too ! Don't twist things around and try and make it appear that your supporting her or her request, you are (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
