| |
In lugnet.org.us, Peter White writes:
> You mean attack a ridiculous reason for exclusion.
> If anyone thinks they can form an organisation with exclusion rules, they
> should expect flak,comments and criticism from whoever. Don't dare tell me
> or anyone else whether they can or cannot have an opinion in a public forum.
> Just think one day you may have children who this rule will affect.
One thing which it may be getting time to do is to remove lugnet.org.us.nelug
from the list since it is not as public a forum as lugnet.org.us (and note
that NONE of the Lugnet groups are truly public).
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) Now, you're bringing in an even more ludicrous argument, 'we','community', 'fit'. (...) NELUG's (...) So who put it forward ? (...) You mean attack a ridiculous reason for exclusion. If anyone thinks they can form an organisation with (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
