|
|
 | | Re: Proposed standard for Mini/Micro Moonbase
|
| Very cool, Bram ! I was looking at the 8x8 idea and thinking it was great, but that it was too small for a lot of detail. It's just a bit smaller than Anders Isaksson's stuff, but big enough to be interesting. -JSM (...) <SNIP> (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.org.scibrick)
| | | | | Proposed standard for Mini/Micro Moonbase
|
| Here's a standard I came up with for a 16x16 module size. This allows quite a bit more detail than the 8x8 standard, yet it's still small enough to allow many modules with limited pieces. (URL) The corridor is a 2x2 round brick and plate, centered (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Proposed Micro/Nano-fig Moonbase Standard
|
| Ok, here's a few. (2 URLs) Me likey! --SteveR (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Proposed Micro/Nano-fig Moonbase Standard
|
| (...) Excellent, that's perfect. I don't like the idea of having a ton of standards though. I'm thinking minifig, and microfig, and that be it. Of course, you could make larger modules, 8x8, 8x16, 16x16, etc. As long as your connectors are centered (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
| | | | | Proposed Micro/Nano-fig Moonbase Standard
|
| Here's a standard I came up with for a Moonbase module based on an 8x8 stud platform. You can fit four of these on every 16x16 stud baseplate...or 16 on a 32...or 36 modules on a 48x48! Imagine the sizes the Moonbase could approach on just a few (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
|
