|
|
 | | Re: Stock Yard Trials
|
| (...) Agreed. I thought we'd begin that when we actually had some full layouts to work with. For these basic brainstorming "idea" files, I just put my initial first, then a brief description (Yard), and a number. Robin (23 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc)
| | | | | Re: Stock Yard Trials
|
| (...) We need to bring back the naming convention we used last year... Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc)
| | | | | Re: Idea for Thomas
|
| (...) Not bad. A more LEGO Pure method... Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc)
| | | | | Idea for Thomas
|
| Kevin, I came across this page, which has a very pretty little train (especially the face) that could easily be adapted for Thomas. It's still 6 wide, and quite recognizable as a face (I think). We could even build the entire face up by one plate, (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc)
| | | | | Re: Stock Yard Trials
|
| Some more attempts at the trapezoid shaped yard: R-Yard3: Perfect geomety, but the "main" line is composed of all curves. Not preferrable or very nice looking. R-Yard4: Geometry is good, and the trapezoid shape works. Minimal curves required to make (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc)
|
|
