 | | Re: rtlToronto15 January issues —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) I *think* that's Iain's way of saying "the different path requirement is not really a good idea" but I'm not sure. :-) I'm still wondering about the joint question... didn't most of the bots at BF have rigid guidewheels that would be (...) (21 years ago, 25-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: rtlToronto15 January issues —Iain Hendry
|
| | | | (...) Forgot the smiley. :) (...) I think the joints are going to be very hard. The only thing I could think of doing, was have the robot somehow open on one side... and have all the drive wheels rotatable so that you could either a) drive your (...) (21 years ago, 25-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: rtlToronto15 January issues —John Gerlach
|
| | | | (...) That's why the rest of the world just sits back and *watches*, while the genius Lego builders (& programmers!) of RTL Toronto come up with amazing solutions to problems the rest of us would be scared to even attempt... Me? I'll stick to (...) (21 years ago, 25-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: rtlToronto15 January issues —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) Backing you up, JohnG Go Trains!! Dave K -the preceeding announcement satisfied many criteria--score 1 point for Magno-Ball, showed my unfailing interest in trains, stayed 'on-topic' (at least, as on-topic for rtlToronto as one can be), and (...) (21 years ago, 25-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
