 | | rtl14 question
|
| During some of our earlier discussions of rtl14 it had been mentioned that the black bricks on a player's side would count as negative points. I was looking at the posted rules and it didn't mention this. Are we scrapping the negative points idea? (...) (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: rtl14 question
|
| (...) Actually, I forgot all about negative points for incorrect blocks (your sorting mistake or opponents deliberate action). Guys, should we do this? I will update the page if people are on board. Calum (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: rtl14 question
|
| (...) you NEED negative points or their is no reason to sort. -- Chris Why do solar calculators have an off button? (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: rtl14 question
|
| (...) In my best Project Manager/QA and Release Manager voice: "It's been up and available for review for weeks. Why are you telling me it's missing now?" How about Good +1, Bad -2? Calum (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: rtl14 question
|
| (...) and in my best overpriced-contracto...ck-country voice I reply: "Bruce pointed this out to me a week ago and I lost the scrap of paper I wrote it on" (...) or even +1, - 1 I'm easy. Chris (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: rtl14 question
|
| (...) Definetly need negative points for Bad bricks..... +1, -1 or +1, -2 is fine by me. John (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: rtl14 question
|
| (...) Changes are up now. I figured -2 because it encourages people to sort harder and commit heinous crimes of pushing bricks to the other side. Calum (21 years ago, 2-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
