 | | Re: 8475 -- a good buy —Chris Magno
|
| | | (...) As soon as i read this I had to try it.... I'm so excited... (sec.) . .. .... ..... ........ Your wrong. :( I added a motor, clicked it into my RPM-o-Meter and just nudged the stick a tinsy-tiny little bit.... NOTHING! then I smooched it just (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 8475 -- a good buy —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | | (...) When you get stuck in the corner, sheesh. Calum (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 8475 -- a good buy —Chris Magno
|
| | | | | | (...) IF you get stuck in a corner, then your opponent comes up behind ya and WACKS ya. -- Chris (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 8475 -- a good buy —Jeff Elliott
|
| | | | | | (...) This reminds me of a go-cart race I was involved in once. 9 or 10 of us rented the place, and it turns out one person was a maniac - always smashing into people. Hyperaggressive when passing. Annoyed a lot of us. So inevitably, he'd end up (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 8475 -- a good buy —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | | | (...) Who said anything about racing? :) I think Chris has this Battlebots esque tanks with big hammers thing in mind... Calum (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 8475 -- a good buy —Jeff Elliott
|
| | | | | | All the more reason to want to be fast & agile. Jeff E (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 8475 -- a good buy —Trevyn Watson
|
| | | | (...) Am not!! (...) Were you using a geared 9v motor non loaded? If so, then it's not surprising that you noticed no difference. Try it with a load. I tried it with a weight at the end of an arm, and at one point on the controller it just buzzed, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | 8475 -- motors and steering Oh My —Chris Magno
|
| | | | (...) Yes I was testing on an unloaded 9V geared motor. Thats how my RPM-o-Meter works best. (...) I just re-did this test and you are correct. when you load a geared motor (i put a 40t gear on the motor and put friction on the teeth) then you can (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 8475 -- motors and steering Oh My —Trevyn Watson
|
| | | | | It is indeed PWM. I got out my oscilliscope and checked it, and here are the results I got: At setting 1 (closest to off): Th: 1ms Tl: 2ms Tt: 3ms 9Vpp At setting 2: Th: 2ms Tl: 1ms Tt: 3ms 9Vpp And at full on, it's just 9v DC. (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 8475 -- motors and steering Oh My —Chris Magno
|
| | | | | | (...) cool. Thanks Trevyn. now if only I had an O-scope and knew what Th, T1, and Tt meant?? ;) Chris (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 8475 -- motors and steering Oh My —Matthias Jetleb
|
| | | | | | (...) Th - Time signal is High Tl - Time signal is Low Tt - total time ------________ Th Tl <---- Tt --------> Matthias Jetleb P.S.: Th/Tt is defined as the duty cycle, expressed as a percent. Therefor: Th=2ms, Tt=3ms = 66% duty cycle. This is (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 8475 -- motors and steering Oh My —Chris Magno
|
| | | | | | Still no baby..... (...) umm, thanks Matt.... but I did put in the winky face after my last statement.... and since you did bring it up my DMM does do true RMS. that's why I have never felt the need for an o-scope. my electronics projects just don't (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 8475 -- motors and steering Oh My —Matthias Jetleb
|
| | | | (...) It doesn't matter. DMM's are not good at measuring pulsed signals. (unless you have one of the more expensive true-RMS meters which can calculate the average of a non-sinusoidal waveform. You really need an oscilloscope for this. (...) It will (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
