Subject:
|
Re: wood vs Lego Box
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Dec 2002 08:08:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
416 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:
> I'm off work for the Christmas break....
>
> Kate has gone out with friends, I have time to work on my robot.
>
> To mess around with concepts i stacked a few lego box's to get close to
> 6"
>
> it has occurred to me that, may be a lego box is more "slick" than
> wood?
>
> Any ideas? if I can make this climb lego box's then it should have no
> problem with wood? Or is it the other way around...
No, I think wood is easier to climb-it gives more traction for tires. The
Lego boxes also deform, which the wood won't.
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: wood vs Lego Box
|
| "Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:H7M6M2.F05@lugnet.com... (...) That of course is all depending on the mass of the robot. :) Iain (22 years ago, 24-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | wood vs Lego Box
|
| I'm off work for the Christmas break.... Kate has gone out with friends, I have time to work on my robot. To mess around with concepts i stacked a few lego box's to get close to 6" it has occurred to me that, may be a lego box is more "slick" than (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
