 | | Re: talking RCX.... —Ka-On Lee
| | | | (...) Yeah sure, if my own hand can be counted as a LEGO piece... OTOH if we still have the 1/N rule, then a pure mechanical bot only need to stack two pieces to get infinite points. So do we still have that rule? (23 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: talking RCX.... —Chris Magno
| | | | | | (...) if you are referring to the old (outdated) rule of modifying one score based on home many RCXen a person has, then the answer is we no longer have that rule. If Calum and I can at all help it, then we will never again limit the number of RCXen (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: talking RCX.... —Calum Tsang
| | | | | (...) No. Chris has vehemently discarded RCX limitations for all future rtlToronto events. If Lego made a high density cluster of RCXes, you could use all of them in rtl12. Calum (23 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | |
